I was reading in 2 Peter this morning. Sometimes things stand out a little more than normal — things I have seen but not seen; that I have read but never really considered.
“His divine power has given us everything needed for life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us by his own glory and goodness.” 2 Peter 1:3. I tend to read right through stuff like this — kind of like, “Ok, yes, that’s good, that’s nice, that’s right.” But stop and think about it for a moment: we have everything we need for life and godliness. How often we think, “If only I had this, if only I could do that, then I would be able to be a good Christian.” I cannot count the number of times I have heard Presbyterians lament the lack of some quality or opportunity that is preventing them from sharing Jesus with others. It is a lie we tell ourselves. He has given us everything needed for life and godliness.
Then came the part that really hit me
For this very reason, you must make every effort to:
- support your faith with goodness,
- and goodness with knowledge,
- and knowledge with self-control,
- and self-control with endurance,
- and endurance with godliness,
- and godliness with mutual affection,
- and mutual affection with love.
For if these things are yours and are increasing among you, they keep you from being ineffective and unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.
This exhortation is a description of the life of discipleship. It is a profound description of Jesus’ Passion.
Faith is the foundation and beginning of the life of discipleship. It is not the stopping point.
Faith must lead to goodness; that is, the choice to pursue that which God commands.
How do you know what God commands? Knowledge. The only way to gain knowledge is to be invested in the life of a community which is itself invested in the study of God’s word. The author of Hebrews chastised listeners/readers with this word, “Though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the based elements of the oracles of God. You need milk, not solid food; for everyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is unskilled in the word of righteousness. But solid food is for the mature, for those whose faculties have been trained by practice to distinguish good from evil.” (Hebrews 5:11-14)
Knowledge of God’s commands — not for our oppression, but for our liberation and freedom in holiness — frames our self-control. Self-control (sometimes patience, sometimes obedience, sometimes action, sometimes passive) requires endurance because self-control inevitably involves choosing to do the right thing and choosing not to do the wrong thing, and that’s not always easy. In fact, self-control is difficult because the wrong thing would be easier, more fun, instantly self-gratifying, etc. And the wrong thing does not just go away; it continues to present itself as a pleasing option which must be endured and resisted.
Endurance yields godliness. It is not a self-righteousness we seek; rather, we humbly praise God for giving us the strength to endure. Our priority is to worship God, to glorify God, and to enjoy God; endurance is, as Eugene Petersen once entitled a study of the Psalms, “A Long Obedience in the Same Direction.”
Godliness is not its own end, either. Godliness does not isolate us from others, it draws us to others. The example of Christ illustrates the point: Jesus did not take his holiness as a reason to distance himself from others; he thrust himself into the midst of community after community in order to express God’s love for those who were lost. Mutual affection is what believers are called to express. We do not have to be Lone Rangers, we are called to partner in Christ’s service.
Mutual affection manifests love. This is more than Hallmark sentiment – violins playing – soft lighting kind of love — this is the kind of love that goes obediently to the cross in the midst of turmoil, controversy, and even betrayal. “No one has greater love than this, to lay down one’s life for one’s friends.” (John 15:13)
All of that is true and I can trace it through and I can still get to the place where I am thinking, “Ok, yes, that’s good, that’s nice, that’s right.”
But then comes the kicker: “For if these things are yours and are increasing among you, they keep you from being ineffective and unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.”
And I thought, “Wow, there it is.” God has given me everything needed for life and godliness; am I being effective and fruitful? Are we being effective and fruitful in the congregation I serve? In our presbytery? In the denomination?
Responding to those questions will be tomorrow’s reflection. Today, I just want to sit and dwell in the questions.



Assembly Committee #18: Board of Pensions, Foundation, Presbyterian Publishing
There is really only one hot issue in Assembly Committee #18: two overtures (Items 18-01 and 18-06) to have the Board of Pensions extend benefits to same-gender “spouses” and domestic partners. There is one item that has interest probably only to me: Item 18-09 regarding the Restricted Funds Resolution Committee.
Extending Benefits
First, the hot issue. It is important to remember: simply because a presbytery (or two) overtures to have the General Assembly do something, it is not bound to do it if it would disrupt the peace, unity and purity of the church. Extending Board of Pension benefits to same-gender “spouses” and domestic partners would disrupt the peace, disrupt the unity, and disrupt the purity of the church.
It would disrupt the peace because it would require every congregation in the denomination to participate — without relief of conscience — in financially underwriting behavior contrary to Scripture. There are no provisions for congregations and/or presbyteries to opt out. This is different than even abortion, which does have a relief of conscience opportunity.
It would disrupt the unity because it would hasten the “devolution” described by the Stated Clerk. The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) is declining precisely because it does not have integrity to the very process it claims to uphold. As noted in the Board of Pension comment, G-6.0106b is the constitutional standard for officers of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.).
With this constitutional mandate in mind, and absent contradictory direction from the General Assembly, the Board would exclude all ministers of the Word and Sacrament from eligibility to enroll a same-gender spouse or same-gender domestic partner.
Three quick notes about that BoP comment:
Approving this overture would disrupt the purity of the church. The church is not the world. The church has standards set by God, revealed in Scripture, with guidance provided in the Book of Confessions, framed out for application in our context in the Book of Order. Has the potter no right over the clay? Who indeed are we, human beings, to argue with God? How can we argue that our desire for insurance trumps the moral imperatives of God’s sovereignty revealed in Scripture?
Approving this overture would be a bad idea for so many reasons.
The Board of Pensions has proposed a substitute motion that is intended to provide more precise language, but it is careful to note that their proposal is NOT an endorsement of the idea.
Frankly, this is one of the “actions of the 219th General Assembly” that would make middle governing bodies request the COGA commission authorize a split.
Restricted Funds Resolution Committee
In contrast to the hot button issue, it gives me great pleasure to note that the Restricted Funds Resolution Committee is a non-issue. Because it is interesting to no one but me is an indication that it was a success.
As a commissioner to the 218th General Assembly, I was assigned to Mission Coordination and Budgets. There was tension between two of the General Assembly entities: specifically, the General Assembly Mission Council and the Foundation. The RFRC was a mechanism designed by commissioners on the fly to allow room and space for the disagreements to be resolved. Without having to resort to using this tool, its existence has facilitated better communication and an environment of trust.